Enhancing Health with Indoor Air
Compiled by Brian Gilligan, PE, GSA's Office of Federal High-Performance Buildings, and the Wellbuilt for Wellbeing Project Team
Why is indoor air important?
Americans spend 90% of their time indoors, so the quality of our indoor air is critical to our health, comfort and performance. Building systems help keep indoor air clean so that we do not get sick from exposure to toxins but more than that should help us stay well, energized, and productive. Recent studies suggest that improving indoor air quality beyond what conventional design requires could reduce rates of absenteeism, inflammation, infection and other symptoms of sick building syndrome by over a third and improve cognitive performance by as much as half. Perhaps there is an opportunity to help people feel healthier and perform better for having been in our buildings.
How might we improve Indoor Air?
There are four key levers to enhance human health, comfort, and performance by improving indoor air. Click each lever below to see specific actions and measurable environmental outcomes.
Building design is an evolving field but it is not always clear where it is best to go beyond convention as there is a balance to be found between the energy associated with heating, cooling and ventilating a space, and the ways in which doing so can elevate the human experience. Evidence-based practice can offer guidance and provide justification for doing so. Current standards for the indoor environment were developed by OSHA and ASHRAE, and they are convention for good reason. They are widely understood and reliably provide safe environments with a predictable level of occupant satisfaction. However, design teams increasingly recognize opportunities not just to protect occupants from acute threats, but also to take an intentional approach to creating superior workplaces. One can see layers of tools and approaches that build on the conventional approach of protecting workers from acute risks and promoting thermal comfort and avoiding occupant complaints. These tools and approaches began with recognizing leadership relative to prevailing codes and standards and have expanded more and more to establishing stringent, research-based standards focused on occupant health and well-being. All of these tools recognize the value of the “Four Levers” in improving workplace health, comfort, and performance.
Lever 1 - Provide More Fresh Air and Deliver it to the Breathing Zone
Ventilation supplies fresh outdoor air to keep indoor air clean and odor-free. It prevents the pollutants that people and their work bring with them from accumulating to unpleasant or unhealthy levels. Building systems are mostly designed to bring in a set minimum amount of fresh, outdoor air. Some systems incorporate demand control ventilation (DCV) systems, which tailor ventilation rates to the number of people in a space. DCV saves energy when fewer people use a space than anticipated.
How much fresh air do existing systems suggest?
The table below identifies ventilation approaches ranging from conventional to more stringent levels.
|Standards/Systems||Minimum Ventilation Rate (@200SF/Person)||CO2 Steady State*|
ASHRAE 62.1, OSHA
ASHRAE 62.1: 5 CFM/Person + 0.06 CFM/SF
Demand Control Ventilation not required
LEED v4 / Well v2, Finnish SIAQ “Good”, Hong Kong “Excellent”
LEED/WELL: ASHRAE + 30%
Demand Control Ventilation required if <40SF/Person
WELL (extra point): ASHRAE + 60%
Demand Control Ventilation required if <40SF/Person
2016 CA Title 24 Standard, Finnish SIAQ “Individual”
CA Title 23: Greater of 0.15 CFM/SF, 15 CFM/Person
Demand Control Ventilation required
Minimum ventilation rates are most often set by ASHRAE Standard 62. The standard considers the size of a building, its intended use, and the number of people expected to be in it. For commercial office buildings it was developed from survey feedback regarding odors or complaints about the “bioeffluents” emitted by people. Under this “conventional” system, an office with 200 square feet for each person requires at least 17 cubic feet of outdoor air per minute per person (CFM/Person).
To set the minimum rate, designers estimate the largest number of people expected to be in a space. The more people, the more contaminants will accumulate. If the number of people is stable contaminants reach a limit or “steady state” level. Removing pollutants and contaminants are addressed more in our filtration discussion but the effect can be tracked in real time by measuring carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. The CO2 level indicates whether the ventilation rate is keeping up with the people present. For a given number of people and size of space, all else being equal, a ventilation rate can be associated with a steady state amount of CO2.
Our “enhanced” systems suggest higher than conventional ventilation rates to bring in more clean outdoor air and dilute pollutants. This results in more CFM/Person of outdoor air and a lower CO2 steady state. Some systems are performance based, and specify a CO2 steady state target instead of a fixed ventilation rate. The enhanced and stringent approaches often require Demand Control to save energy when fewer people show up to a space and the higher ventilation rate is not needed to “keep up” with their presence.
How might more fresh air benefit people?
According to a significant body of research, more fresh air is better for our health. Higher ventilation rates supplying more outdoor air are associated with less absenteeism, fewer symptoms of sick building syndrome, and better performance on standardized cognitive tests. Both ventilation rates and expected CO2 levels have been used as measures for this.
Researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL) found increasing the conventional ventilation rate from 17 to 22 CFM/Person across the US (i.e. shifting from the conventional to an enhanced approach) could save $12B a year in costs associated with employee performance, absenteeism, and sick building symptoms. 22CFM/Person is roughly the rate required to earn the Enhanced Ventilation credit under the LEED rating system. The same study found that further increasing the ventilation rate to 33CFM/Person would save $38B a year.1 This is roughly what is required under the California Title 24 standard. A study of 40 buildings found that increasing ventilation to 50CFM per person reduced short term absenteeism rates by 35%2 and another study found greatly reduced symptoms of sick building syndrome at this rate.3 Finally, a literature review found that increased use of economizers to bring in more fresh air related to reduced absentee costs of $0.30-$0.80 per square foot.4 Many of these studies accounted for the increased energy needed to provide more fresh air. They found the savings associated with increasing ventilation was an order of magnitude larger than the increased cost of moving and conditioning outdoor air to provide it.
The CogFX study tested performance on a rigorous cognitive assessment called the Strategic Management Survey under different air quality conditions. At 950ppm (less CO2 than expected when ventilation provides 22CFM/Person outdoor air) participants performed 15% worse than at 650ppm (slightly less than the CO2 level expected at 30CFM/Person). At 1500ppm, more CO2 than expected at the conventional ventilation rate but still frequently found in conference and other small meeting rooms, participants fared 50% worse.5 A follow on field study using the same test found participants in buildings with ventilation rates of 22CFM/Person performed 26% better than those in buildings with conventional ventilation rates of 17 CFM/Person.6 Whether CO2 is the direct driver of these conditions or a proxy for other conditions associated with ventilation rates is not supported by all studies,7,8,9 but the general relation between increased ventilation and performance is less controversial.
Though not directly related to health, wellbeing and performance in commercial office buildings several studies explored the influence of classroom air quality on the performance of children in school. One study used a literature review to review other relevant studies and developed a model based on their findings. The study found students were 12% faster at certain routine tasks and psychological tests, and 2% more accurate when CO2 was reduced from 4,100ppm to 900ppm.10,11
Once you select a minimum rate for the building, is air quality always the same?
Designers calculate a building’s ventilation rate based on the maximum number of people they expect, but the nature of indoor environments is much more dynamic. Several factors like contaminants introduced by people, outdoor pollution levels, leaky structures and facades, renovations after construction, and the approach used to distribute air within a space all affect air quality. Still, the number of people in a space can be the most dynamic factor day to day. The more people, the less effective a given ventilation rate will be at maintaining air quality and removing the “bioeffluents” and other contaminants those people bring. Carbon dioxide (CO2) can be measured to show this effect. ASHRAE 62 sets a maximum target for CO2 equal to the quantity of CO2 in outdoor air plus 700ppm. Since there is usually about 400-500ppm CO2 in outdoor air conventional ventilation rates should keep indoor CO2 below ~1,200ppm. However the dynamic factors present in the building mean that the designer’s initial calculation alone is not enough. To optimize a building’s indoor environment so that it enhances health, comfort and performance requires continuous, distributed measurement and adaptive management.
Some spaces are more dynamic than others. Large, sparsely-occupied spaces like open plan or private offices will usually stay below the design target. Small, densely-occupied spaces like conference, focus and class-rooms will vary more and frequently rise above the target. When, where and how long you measure makes a big difference.
Design, build and operate ventilation systems understanding the factors that affect performance:
- The fresh air intake should be located away from loading docks and other pollution sources.
- Fresh air delivery risers, plenums and diffusers must be open and properly distributed to deliver fresh air effectively. ASHRAE rates the effectiveness of several different air distribution strategies. However, the performance of all such strategies are susceptible to impact from changes to floor plan or furniture. Ensure the system is regularly balanced and any floor modifications consider the air distribution strategy in your building.
What should we consider when designing fresh air rates for new or retrofit space?
GSA’s Total Workplace Scorecard (to be deployed summer 2020; requests can be sent to AskFMI@gsa.gov) lists a number of factors believed to contribute to improving indoor air quality and increasing the effectiveness of ventilation systems. Here are a few things to consider when designing new systems or renovating existing systems:
It is important to balance the benefits of giving people more fresh air with the cost of providing it. For example, it takes energy to heat or cool fresh outdoor air to comfortable temperatures. Several strategies can mitigate or eliminate the cost of providing fresh air. Economizers make use of “free cooling” when outside temperatures are mild and heat recovery systems pull energy out of air before it is exhausted from the building during heating and cooling seasons. Heat recovery systems extract the heat or coolth of exhausted air and transfer it to incoming fresh air when conditions are too cold or too hot. Perhaps most importantly, Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) systems provide feedback to make sure that ventilation rates are slowed when spaces are not fully occupied. This makes sure ventilation energy is used efficiently to provide benefits when people are there and save energy when they are not. CA Title 24 requires use of economizers, heat recovery systems and Demand Control Ventilation.
Conventional HVAC designs usually combine the functions of maintaining air quality with maintaining thermal comfort. Often, thermal comfort conditioning takes precedence and some times fresh air flow may be compromised in a given space. DOAS decouple ventilation from conditioning. They provide ventilation consisting of 100% outdoor air at a rate that is not dependent on the heating or cooling needs of the space. The result is a more consistent amount of outdoor air and less likelihood of over-cooling or overheating. Such systems also allow individuals to set temperatures to their personal comfort without impacting the flow of fresh air to the space. DOAS do not necessarily provide more fresh air, they provide the amount of fresh air they are designed to provide and provide it more consistently than the more common VAV systems.
It is important to note that outdoor air in polluted environments may require more filtration for DOAS to truly enhance health. Our discussion on filtration goes into more detail on this subject
Natural ventilation and mixed mode systems have been shown to increase comfort and satisfaction. They are often assisted by less energy intensive personal fans, ceiling fans, etc to move air through the building during seasons or weather conditions where the air does not move sufficiently. Fans may increase satisfaction by giving people more control over their environment, providing more variability in conditions, and changing the range of conditions that feel comfortable to them. The term “adaptive comfort” derives from study of natural ventilation.
- Fans and circulation: How can fans improve comfort and energy efficiency?
- Variability: Facility managers can create Experiential Delight for occupant
- Adaptive comfort: Occupants be empowered to promote their own comfort
Finally, buildings with natural or mixed-mode ventilation may create indoor environments with a more “natural microbiome” than buildings that rely only on mechanical ventilation.13 Tightly-sealed, mechanically-ventilated buildings tend to reduce the diversity of microorganisms overall and favor human pathogens in particular. Similarly, natural ventilation near natural features like rivers, cascades, forests, mountains or coastal surf may introduce “negative ions” which some research suggests may reduce particulates14 and ameliorate depression.15 However, these topics are not well understood and a profusion of products claiming to provide benefits related to them are based on little or no evidence. Exercise caution when designing for these benefits.
Lever 2 - Remove Outdoor Pollutants
Indoor air quality is influenced by outdoor air pollutants. Of these, fine particulate matter (PM) and ozone (O3) account for much of the adverse health effects associated with air pollution. Importantly, most of our exposure to these pollutants actually occurs where they are brought indoors.16 Most commercial office buildings use filters to remove PM from outdoor air and some, though many fewer, use filters with activated carbon to remove O3.
Wide ranges of outdoor air pollution can be found across the U.S. Generally, higher PM and O3 levels are found in urban areas. PM forms directly as a by-product of combustion in cars, buildings and industrial processes while O3 forms after volatile organic compounds released from these same sources go through chemical changes in the air. Periodic or seasonal events like wildfires can cause dramatic, if temporary increases across a whole region as seen in the wildfires in California in 2017 and 2018. Significant local variations can also be found due to placement of industrial facilities or major traffic arteries within a given region.
The table below provides a summary of approaches to building air filtration that help protect the indoor air we breathe from outdoor pollutants. The higher the MERV rating of a building’s filters, the more outdoor air pollution you can have and still provide good air quality indoors. Filters must be properly maintained, however, to get this benefit as dirty higher-MERV filters can actually be worse for people than clean lower-MERV filters. Outdoor air infiltration can also be reduced by using building systems to maintain positive pressure conditions. This can reduce PM infiltration through the building envelope.
How much filtration do existing approaches suggest?
|Outdoor Pollutant Levels||Conventional "Good" Indoor Levels||Enhanced "Better" |
If outdoor 8-Hour average levels are:
|Prescriptive: MERV 8
Removes ~30% of PM
|Prescriptive: MERV 13
Removes ~60% of PM
LEED v4 / Well v2
|Performance: Stay below 12-15 μg/m3
RESET High / Well v2
|0 - 20 μg/m3 *
Most U.S. urban areas in typical pollution conditions
|0 - 14 μg/m3||0 - 8 μg/m3||<12-15 μg/m3
or 75% less than outdoors
|20 - 50 μg/m3 *
U.S. urban areas in peak pollution conditions
|14 - 35 μg/m3||6 - 20 μg/m3||<12-15 μg/m3
or 75% less than outdoors
|50 - 100+ μg/m3 *
Some overseas urban, extreme events
|35 - 90+ μg/m3||20 - 40+ μg/m3||<12-15 μg/m3
or 75% less than outdoors
|Expansion space||Install sufficient rack space to respond to extreme events
|Ozone & VOCs||No benefit||Activated Carbon
Removal of ozone / VOCs
Removal of ozone / VOCs
|Airborne Pathogens||No benefit||Ultraviolet
Sanitizes air of pathogens
Sanitizes air of pathogens
Under the Clean Air Act, U.S. outdoor air quality and pollutant levels are monitored by the EPA using a network of high-quality meters in each county across the country. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) capture the pollutant levels for 6 “criteria pollutants” including PM and O3 which require action if exceeded. NAAQS limits PM to an annual average below 12 μg/m3 and a daily average below 35 μg/m3 for PM, and it limits O2 to an 8-hour average below .07 ppm. In locations exceeding these limits, building filtration could maintain air quality within NAAQS. However, indoor air quality standards are not usually designed for this.
Indoor air quality standards are designed to protect against toxic effects of contaminants like asbestos, carbon monoxide and mold. ASHRAE’s Standard 62, referenced by many local buildings codes, requires a minimum filtration level to protect HVAC components from fouling. While these approaches do offer some protection from chronic effects, evolving building rating systems like LEED v4 and WELL v2 offer credits designed specifically to reduce them. The RESET Air for Commercial Interiors “High Performance” (RESET High) system goes further by establishing targets for indoor pollutant levels.
How might more filtration and less indoor pollution benefit our health?
Enhanced and stringent approaches to filtration will result in better indoor air quality. Approaches that provide some flexibility to prescriptive requirements or that are performance-based may also save energy while providing those health benefits.
PM, especially ultrafine particles smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), contribute to long-term chronic conditions like heart and respiratory disease, stroke, cognitive decline, and lung cancer.17 Reducing peak levels of PM can also immediately reduce acute symptoms like inflammation and irritation of airways. While the World Health Organization (WHO) says that no level of PM is risk-free it suggests a target of 10 μg/m3 over 8 hours for all regions to avoid the worst health risks. This WHO threshold is similar to the NAAQS annual level 12 μg/m3 over 8 hours.
According to the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study, PM is responsible for more than 3 million premature deaths each year. As such, the chronic effects of particulate pollution were found to be more lethal than epidemics of malaria or AIDS at the time. Most of these effects were related to pollution in the growing urban areas of Asia and Africa. However, a recent study found that reducing PM to the WHO target in the relatively cleaner conditions found in most of the developed world could save a half million lives per year.17 Moving from conventional to enhanced or stringent filtration in U.S. office buildings where local or peak conditions exceed the WHO threshold would achieve this goal.
Breathing ozone can trigger a similar variety of short term, acute health problems including chest pain, coughing, and irritation and inflammation of airways. These effects worsen chronic conditions like bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma. While the effects of O3 are generally short-term, long-term exposure can also damage lung tissue increasing medical costs and reducing lung function over time.
Filters containing activated carbon have been shown to be effective at removing ozone.18 Carbon filtration is much less common than particulate filters and are typically added as additional pre-filters on building air intakes. Carbon filters can be normal fibrous filters with activated carbon added to them or granular beds of activated carbon. The WELL Standard v2 offers points for carbon filters.
Conventional design approaches are often prescriptive in nature and view filters as static. They provide the same level of filtration at all times regardless of actual pollutant levels. The only dynamic is that filters be cleaned or replaced as needed
Designers could base filter selection on expected levels of outdoor air pollution. Considering local air quality data, the MERV rating could be sized to ensure that indoor air levels meet NAAQS or RESET High standards under normal conditions. Further, the WELL Standard v2 suggests that the filter rack should be designed to allow space for additional filters, filters with higher MERV rating, or activated carbon filtration when such need arises. With that spare capacity, filtration can be added as needed if outdoor conditions change due to seasonal variation or other unplanned contingency like wildfires.
Like increasing ventilation rate, adding filtration requires more energy to move air. Creating flexibility to scale filtration to the level and type of outdoor pollution allows building operators to save energy when high levels of filtration are not needed and invest energy in protecting occupants when they are.
Source: NASA. New Map Offers a Global View of Health-Sapping Air Pollution. 09/22/2010. Credit: Dalhousie University, Aaron van Donkelaar.
- The EPA provides data at the county level showing where air quality fails to meet Clean Air Act NAAQS. Buildings in these counties are in greater need of providing protection to occupants generally. The data is collected by a network of high-quality, reference-grade air quality meters. However, large inter-regional variation can occur. Pollution levels can be significantly higher in specific parts of a city or region (e.g. those near transportation hubs and corridors, factories, power plants, etc.) than others. There is data available to owners and designers on this subject. The EPA has made access to a voluntary network of additional meters through its Real Time Geospatial Data Viewer (RETIGO). Bloomberg offers this map of pollutant levels in metro centers around the world. Also, the World Green Building Council welcomes organizations to purchase and deploy outdoor air quality monitors and share data through their Plant a Sensor campaign. These resources allow designers and operators to benefit from and contribute to a better understanding of hyper-local outdoor air quality conditions.
- Maintaining positive pressure in the building will reduce infiltration of outdoor air pollutants through leaky building facades and around leaky windows and doors.
- Designers should avoid placing building air intakes near sources of pollution like street-level near traffic, near exhaust vents from kitchens or building furnaces. These bring pollution into the building and degrade filters more quickly.
- Consider also what opportunities there are to create green buffers between outdoor pollutant sources and the building (e.g., trees, green walls, similar landscaping). These create interest and appealing space for physical activity while separating pollutants from entrance through air intakes or infiltration.
- Increasing filtration level can require tradeoffs in some, especially older, existing buildings. Increased filtration may increase the strain on fans to push the same amount of air through them. This requires an increase in fan speed or less air will be delivered to the indoor spaces. Where fans are constant speed or undersized there will be less fresh air delivered to spaces, and, there will be an increase in maintenance requirements for the fans. More expensive filters that do not create as much resistance to air flow despite the greater filtration should be used where fan speed is an issue.
Lever 3 - Manage Thermal Conditions
Thermal conditions in office buildings are generally viewed from the perspective of comfort rather than health. Priority is placed on maintaining uniform conditions that can't meet the wide range of personal factors and preferences people have. While there are six factors that affect thermal comfort most buildings use only air temperature to manage indoor conditions. Perhaps we create suboptimal indoor environments by avoiding variation and ignoring the influence of other factors like humidity on health. The limitations to our conventional approach are evident in the fact that ASHRAE 55 standard for thermal comfort accepts as success receiving complaints from 1 in 5 occupants that conditions are too hot or too cold.
Indoor temperatures are generally kept to between 68-76 Degrees Fahrenheit. Outside this range more people complain of discomfort and find they are slower, less precise and less able to focus on tasks. After temperature, humidity has the most significant impact on health and performance. However, it has little direct impact on results in comfort surveys. Human beings have no direct ability to sense RH and perceive it instead as discomfort with temperature or as “stuffy” air. While high-humidity leads to significant, often visible, mold and other microbial growth, dry air’s issues are generally unfelt and unseen. For this reason, lower bounds for RH have been gradually removed from ASHRAE standards for comfort and ventilation. Poor experience with humidification in older building system designs has made many designers wary of actively addressing dry air. However, improved design and equipment and an emerging body of research supports testing methods to tighten control of RH around an optimal range.
|Approach||RH Range |
|Environmental / Health Outcome|
|Maintain <60% RH||Mold and microbial growth are prevented avoiding serious acute and long-term health impacts
Dry air driven by weather and indoor heating:
|Maintain 20%-60% RH||
Dry air varies with weather but avoids extremes:
ASHRAE Japan (Healthcare)
|Maintain 40%-60% RH||
RH maintained within a tight range:
If there is an optimal range for temperature, is there also an optimal range for RH?
A growing body of research has found evidence of an optimal range for RH between 40-60%. Researchers with GSA, the University of Arizona and Baylor College of Medicine found higher stress and poorer sleep quality outside this range.19 While the impacts of high indoor RH are accepted and often visible, low RH or dry air is increasingly seen as important as well.
Typical impacts of dry air include:
Increased humidity may reduce the quantity or count of particles suspended in indoor air. This is a complex phenomenon that is influenced by the size, shape and hygroscopy of the particles themselves which vary. Studies have shown conflicting results but water absorbing particles tend to spend longer in the air in dry conditions and be more easily resuspended by traffic in low RH.20,21
Dry air degrades the eye’s tear film and mucous membranes in skin and airways making them more susceptible to inflammation20,21,22 and infection.23 Additionally, dry air has been associated with increased production of the inflammatory stress hormone cortisol in skin.24 Dry air has been shown to break down precorneal tear film (PTF) in as little as an hour causing cascading inflammatory effects; the formation of dry spots also makes the eyes more susceptible to inflammatory effects of common air pollutants including particulate matter and oxidants like ozone.22,25 Hydration from increased RH or moist inserts on glasses worn by patients with dry eyes relieved these symptoms.26 Dessication of nasal mucosal membranes by cold dry air causes increased release of inflammatory mediators making particulate matter more likely to adhere to surface cells.23
While the mechanisms are complex and not fully understood, cold, dry air conditions may increase the risk of transmission of certain viruses including the influenza virus in three ways.20,27,28 First, dried airways in the nose and upper respiratory tracts are more susceptible.23 Second, dry air may allow influenza virus to survive longer in the air.27,29,30 Third, increased humidity larger droplets that may carry influenza to evaporate more slowly and remain large.28 The larger particles settle out of air faster and become less likely to be later resuspended in the air by movement in the space.20,31
Dry air contributes to dehydration through “insensate” water loss or direct transfer of water from the skin to the air; dehydration persisting several hours is common to office workers and leads to fatigue, impaired visual focus, and reduced concentration.32,33 Additionally, chronic dehydration can lead to degradation of the immune system.29
How can we manage thermal conditions to improve occupant health?
We can improve the building envelope to reduce uncomfortable conditions shown to affect performance. Eliminate hot or cold walls and windows by improving insulation, reduce direct solar gain through windows with appropriate shading and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC), and eliminating drafts around windows and doors.
We can actively manage RH, provide greater individual control and choice in temperature, and monitor room-level conditions to prompt behavioral interventions.
Radiant heating and cooling strategies could spur energy savings by enabling a wider range of indoor air temperatures, passive humidification during heating operations,34 and desiccant dehumidification during cooling operations.35 Active hydration or humidification of air should be considered in locations where seasonal dry air do not allow for passive humidification especially in winter in temperate locations.
A wider range of indoor air operating temperatures within a given building could allow radiant strategies to save energy and also improve comfort for those that traditional design leave most dissatisfied. Occupants should be given the freedom to choose their workspace based on comfort or have access to personal comfort devices and greater direct control of temperature at the workspace.36
Personal preferences, clothing choice, and physiology make it very hard to please everyone. Providing increased choice and variation in conditions may address this. Consider increasing the number of thermostats to give occupants greater control of temperature in smaller areas, and creating areas with different temperatures to allow folks to choose the workplace that best fits their preferences. UC Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon University, among others, have conducted extensive research on how to achieve greater levels of satisfaction with the work environment.
Distributed sensor networks could be provided in workplaces and used to prompt individuals to take restorative actions, such as micro breaks, that reduce fatigue and irritation to the human eye caused by dry air. These networks could also help building operators improve thermal comfort through more active controls over temperature and humidity.19 These strategies are not new but they have been narrowly applied in practice.
The prevalence of personal devices and the internet of things provide an opportunity to give feedback in personalized ways. Our devices already prompt us to be more active if we’ve been inactive. Perhaps they could prompt microbreaks to reduce eye strain and dry eyes when our computer notes we’ve been working uninterrupted for a long time and the building knows the air is dry. Perhaps when the temperature and humidity levels are high our devices could prompt us to drink water to stay hydrated and deploy a personal fan to stay cool and disperse our CO2 Bubble if we’ve been inactive and at our seats in warm, dry air. Perhaps our temperature, sound and lighting preferences could be shared along with actual sensor measurements with a workplace reservation system so that the desk with the best set of conditions for us is suggested. All these things are coming, and gathering such data may improve our health, comfort and performance as well as our understanding of how our levers drive those things.
Lever 4 - Eliminate Indoor Contaminants
While outdoor air pollutants can contribute a lot to poor indoor air quality, contaminants are introduced by the things people bring into the building as well. So-called “source control” is critical to maintaining healthy indoor air and should be addressed through building design, purchasing policy and educating building occupants on the impacts of their behavior. Source control is especially important in avoiding concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) which are often introduced by new furnishings, construction and renovation activities, administrative processes including cleaning and print/copy activities, personal items like food, disinfectant and other aerosols, poor hygiene, and personal care products. Particulate matter (PM) contaminants are also introduced through ventilation, infiltration, and occupant movement and activity.
The majority of ventilation systems in commercial buildings do not provide 100% outdoor air. Many supply the minimum amount of fresh outdoor air required by building code. That amount of outdoor air is not enough to maintain comfortable temperatures inside the building so the outdoor air is mixed with conditioned air brought back from occupied spaces. This “return air,” or “recirculated air,” allows the system to save energy on heating and cooling outdoor air. Particulate contaminants can be removed by filters on the return air system (if there are filters) but VOCs introduced indoors must be flushed out by fresh outdoor air over time. Avoiding contamination through source control is important; increasing fresh air supply is also.
In the event of a large indoor contamination (such as a renovation or some unplanned incident) there are several tools that can be used to remove contaminants. Flushing the indoor environment with a large amount of outdoor air, temporarily placing more filtration on return air branches, and extending the hours of HVAC operation can all be effective. IAQ measurements meeting RESET Air Standards could be taken before and after this process to show whether clean air conditions have been achieved.
GSA wishes to thank the following contributors for their input to the Wellbuilt for Wellbeing project:
- Seema Bhangar, Ph.D., WeWork, Inc.
- Alyse Falconer, PE, Point Energy Innovations
- Traci Hanegan, PE, ASHRAE Fellow, Coffman Engineers, Inc.
- Kevin Keene, LEED-AP, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Luke Leung, PE, LEED Fellow, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, LLP
- Casey Lindberg, Ph.D., HKS Inc.
- Vivian Loftness, Ph.D., FAIA, Carnegie Mellon University
- Forrest Meggers, Ph.D., Princeton University
- Shona O’Dea, WELL-AP, RESET AP, DLR Group, Inc.
- Jovan Pantelic, Ph.D., University of California at Berkeley
- Chris Pyke, Ph.D., LEED Fellow, ArcSkoru
- Z Smith, FAIA, Eskew+Dumez+Ripple, APC
- Stephanie Taylor, M.D., Taylor Healthcare Consulting
- Nora Wang, Ph.D.. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
References1 Fisk, W.J., D. Black, & G. Brunner. (2011). Benefits and Costs of Improved IEQ in U.S. Offices. Indoor Air, 21(3):357-367. 2 Milton, D.K., P.M. Glencross, & M.D. Walters. (2000). Risk of Sick Leave Associated with Outdoor Air Supply Rate, Humidification, and Occupant Complaints. Indoor Air, 10(4):212-221. 3 Sundell, J. H. Levin, W.W. Nazaroff, W.S. Cain, W.J. Fisk, D.T. Grimsrud, F. Gyntelberg, Y. Li, A.K. Persily, A. C. Pickering, J.M. Samet, J.D. Spengler, S.T. Taylor, & C.T. Weschler. (2011). Ventilation Rates and Health: Multidisciplinary Review of Scientific Literature. Indoor Air, 21(3):191-204. 4 Fisk, W.J., O. Seppanen, D. Faulkner, & J. Huang. (2003). Economizer System Cost Effectiveness: Accounting for the Influence of Ventilation Rate on Sick Leave. Healthy Buildings Conference, Singapore. 5 Allen, J.G., P. MacNaughton, U. Satish, S. Santanam, J. Vallarino, J.D. Spengler. (2016). Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(6). 6 MacNaughton, P., U. Satish, J. Guillermo Cedeno Laurent, S. Flanigan, J. Vallarino, B. Coull, & J.D. Spengler, & J.G. Allen. (2017).The Impact of Working in a Green Certified Building on Cognitive Function and Health. Building and Environment, 114:178-186. 7 Scully, R.R. M. Basner, J. Nasrini, C. Lam, E. Hermosillo, R.C. Gur, T. Moore, D.J. Alexander, U. Satish, & V.E. Ryder. (2019).Effects of Acute Exposures to Carbon Dioxide on Decision Making and Cognition in Astronaut-like Subjects. npj Microgravity, 5:17. 8 National Research Council. (2007). Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Volume 1. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 9 Zhang, X., P. Wargocki, & Z. Lian. (2016). Human Responses to Carbon Dioxide, A Follow-up Study at Recommended Exposure Limits in Non-Industrial Environments. Building and Environment, 100:162-171. 10 Wargocki, P. J.A. Porras-Salazar. S. Contreras-Espinoza, & W. Bahnfleth. (2020). The Relationships Between Classroom Air Quality and Children’s Performance in School. Building and Environment, 173:106749. 11 Stafford, T. M. (2015). Indoor Air Quality and Academic Performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 70:34–50. 12 Pantelic, J., L. Shichao, L. Pistore, D. Licina, M. Vannucci, S. Sadrizadeh, A. Ghahramani, B. Gilligan, E. Sternberg, K. Kampschroer, & S. Schiavon. (2019). Personal CO2 Cloud: Laboratory Measurements of Metabolic CO2 Inhalation Zone Concentration and Dispersion in a Typical Office Desk Setting. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30(4). 13 Kembel, S., E. Jones, J. Kline, D. Northcutt, J. Stenson, A.M. Womack, B.J.M. Bohannan, G.Z. Brown, & J.L. Green. (2012). Architectural Design Influences the Diversity and Structure of the Built Environment Microbiome. ISME J 6:1469–1479. 14 Jiang, S.-Y., A. Ma, & S. Ramachandran. (2018). Negative Air Ions and Their Effects on Human Health and Air Quality Improvement. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(10):2966. 15 Perez, V., D.D. Alexander, & W.H. Bailey. (2013). Air Ions and Mood Outcomes: A Review and Meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 13(29). 16 Zhao, D., P. Azimi, & B. Stephens. (2015). Evaluating the Long-Term Health and Economic Impacts of Central Residential Air Filtration for Reducing Premature Mortality Associated with Indoor Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) of Outdoor Origin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(7):8448-8479. 17 Apte, J. & P. Pant. (2019). Toward Cleaner Air for a Billion Indians. PNAS, 116(22):10614-10616. 18 Fisk, W.J., M. Spears, D. Sullivan, & M. Mendell. (2009). Ozone Removal by Filters Containing Activated Carbon: A Pilot Study. Healthy Buildings Conference, Syracuse, New York. 19 Razjouyan, J., H. Lee, B. Gilligan, et al. (2020). Wellbuilt for Wellbeing: Controlling Relative Humidity in the Workplace Matters for our Health. Indoor Air, 30:167– 179. 20 Wolkoff, P. (2018). Indoor Air Humidity, Air Quality, and Health - An Overview. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 221(3):376-390. 21 Wolkoff, P. (2018). The Mystery of Dry Indoor Air - An Overview. Environmental International, 121(2). 22 Wolkoff, P. (2017). External Eye Symptoms in Indoor Environments. Indoor Air, 27:246-260. 23 Naclerio R.M., J. Pinto, P. Assanasen, & F.M. Baroody. (2007). Observations on the Ability of the Nose to Warm and Humidify Inspired Air. Rhinology, 45(2):102-111. 24 Zhu, G., Z. Janjetovic, & A. Slominski. (2014). On the Role of Environmental Humidity on Cortisol Production by Epidermal Keratinocytes. Experimental Dermatology, 23:15-17. 25 Huang, J-Y., P-T. Yeh, & Y-C. Hou. (2016). A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Oral Antioxidant Supplement Therapy in Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome. Clinical Opthamology, 10:813-820. 26 Wang, M., E. Chan, L. Ea, C. Kam, Y. Lu, S.L. Misra, & J.P. Craig. (2017). Randomized Trial of Desktop Humidifier for Dry Eye Relief in Computer Users. Optometry and Vision Science, 94(11):1052-1057. 27 Noti, J.D., F.M. Blachere, C.M. McMillen, W.G. Lindsley, M.L. Kashon, D.R. Slaughter, & D.H. Beezhold. (2013). High Humidity Leads to Loss of Infectious Influenza Virus from Simulated Coughs. PLOS One 8(2): e57485. 28 Marr, L.C., J.W. Tang, J. Van Mullekom, & S.S. Lakdawala. (2019). Mechanistic Insights into the Effect of Humidity on Airborne Influenza Virus Survival, Transmission and Incidence. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 16(150). 29 Morawska, L. (2006). Droplet Fate in Indoor Environments, or can we Prevent the Spread of Infection?. Indoor Air, 16:335-347. 30 Tang, J.W. (2009). The Effect of Environmental Parameters on the Survival of Airborne Infectious Agents. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6:S737–S746. 31 Qian, J., J. Peccia, & A.R. Ferro. (2014). Walking-induced Particle Resuspension in Indoor Environments. Atmospheric Environment, 89:464-481. 32 Chua S.J.L., A.S. Ali, & M.E.L. Lim. (2016). Physical Environment Comfort Impacts on Office Employee’s Performance. MATEC Web Conference, 66:00124. 33 Wyon, D.P., L. Fang, L. Lagercrantz, & P. Ole Fanger. (2006). Experimental Determination of the Limiting Criteria for Human Exposure to Low Winter Humidity Indoors (RP-1160). HVAC&R Research, 12(2):201-213. 34 Scofield, M.C., N. Deschamps, & T.S. Weaver. (2016). Variable Air Volume System Heat Recovery Economizer. ASHRAE, 58(5):34-36,38,40,42,44. 35 Rysanek, A., P. Murray, J. Pantelic, C. Miller, F. Meggers, & A. Schlueter. (2015).The Design of a Decentralized Ventilation System for an Office in Singapore: Key Findings for Future Research. Proceedings of International Conference CISBAT 2015 Future Buildings and Districts Sustainability from Nano to Urban Scale. LESO-PB, EPFL. 36 Bauman, F., H. Zhang, E. Arens, P. Raftery, C. Karmann, J. Feng, Y. Zhai, D. Dickerhoff, S. Schiavon, & X. Zhou. (2015). Advanced Integrated Systems Technology Development: Personal Comfort Systems and Radiant Slab Systems. UC Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment.
Page last updated 06/11/2020
Adaptive Thermal Comfort
Adaptive Thermal Comfort is the theory that occupants can adapt to be comfortable at a variety of temperatures. Since comfort is based on many factors, including air speed, humidity, and temperature, adaptive thermal comfort strives to connect occupants to the outdoor world, and empower them to feel comfortable in their environments.
Adequate Ventilation and Exhaust
Adequate ventilation and exhaust is important to prevent build-up of odors, carbon dioxide, allergens and toxins in indoor air. Provide separate exhaust for copy, printing, break rooms, and food preparation areas. Flush out occupied spaces prior to occupancy. Use energy efficient or variable drive fans for enhanced air movement. Consider bringing in more fresh air into the building. Ensure the building management staff is conducting preventive maintenance on all building exhaust systems (restrooms, garage exhaust fans, etc). Seal ventilation duct opening during construction or renovations to reduce dust and particle build-up.
Air contaminants are any substances in the air, particulate or gaseous, which pollute the air and make it hazardous to human health. Good indoor air quality management techniques seek to reduce the amount of contaminants in the air and protect the health of vulnerable building occupants.
Entryway Systems/Walk-off Mats
Toxins are tracked into a building on occupants’ shoes. Entryway systems, like grates, grills, and walk-off mats can greatly reduce the amount of outside dirt, dust, and particulates brought into the building. This makes for a cleaner environment, and cuts down on the amount of cleaning necessary to maintain a high level of cleanliness in the facility.
Health, as defined by World Health Organization in its 1948 constitution, is “a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”. This definition of health has been expanded in recent years to include (1) resilience and the ability to cope with health problems and (2) the capacity to return to an equilibrium state after health challenges.
These three health domains - physical, psychological, and social - are not mutually exclusive but rather interact to create a sense of health that changes over time and place. The challenge for building design and operations is to identify cost-effective ways to eliminate health risks while also providing positive physical, psychological, and social supports as well as coping resources.
Learn more about Buildings and Health.
Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems are designed to work together to maintain occupant comfort. From residential to commercial settings, HVAC systems help to keep people comfortable and healthy by maintaining good indoor air quality and comfortable temperatures.
Outside air is fresh air that comes into the facility as supply air. It is mixed with air already conditioned in the space.
Outdoor air that is used to replace air removed from a building through an exhaust system. Replacement air may be derived from one or more of the following: makeup air, supply air, transfer air, and infiltration. However, the ultimate source of all replacement air is outdoor air. When replacement air exceeds exhaust, the result is exfiltration.
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS)
When occupants feel sick at work, but not elsewhere, they likely have SBS. SBS often manifests as cold or flu-like symptoms after breathing stale or contaminated air. It harms worker productivity and morale. It may also increase absenteeism and worker turnover. See EPA's Sick Building Syndrome Factsheet for more information.
Supply air is air delivered to a space by mechanical ventilation. It can be 100% outside air, or it can be a combination of outdoor air, recirculated air and / or transfer air. Although it may seem like a good idea to use 100% outside air, the air needs to be conditioned (heated or cooled) before it can be circulated, so it makes sense to use only as much as is necessary to keep the circulating air fresh and the energy use down.
Workspaces should be designed to provide the optimum level of thermal comfort for the occupants. Occupant comfort should be based on ASHRAE Standard 55.
Ventilating is the process of "changing" or replacing air in any space to replenish oxygen, control temperature, and remove moisture, odors, smoke, heat, dust, airborne bacteria, and carbon dioxide. Ventilation includes both the exchange of air to the outside as well as circulation of air within the building. It is one of the most important factors for maintaining acceptable indoor air quality in a building.
Ventilation is the process of "changing" or replacing air in any space to control temperature; remove moisture, odors, smoke, heat, dust, airborne bacteria, and carbon dioxide; and to replenish oxygen. Ventilation includes both the exchange of air to the outside as well as circulation of air within the building. It is one of the most important factors for maintaining acceptable indoor air quality in buildings.